2. Which of the following is the best definition of probable operating costs? (1 point)
Amount of money required to start a business
Amount of money required to market a business
Amount of money required to purchase business equipment
Amount of money required to keep a business running
3. What may be offered to clients when banks find the risk too high? (1 point)
Proprietary money
Private money
Personal money
Partnership money
4. Which of the following is a start-up cost associated with opening a business? (1 point)
Equipment
Legal fees/Licensing
Insurance
All of the above
5. What is a term used widely among real estate investors to refer to non-traditional means of real estate financing, or financing techniques not commonly used? (1 point)
Common financing
Capital financing
Leverage financing
Creative financing
6. What does “OPM” stand for in leveraging OPM? (1 point)
Organizational profit management
Other profit means
Other people’s money
Organizational profit marketing
7. Generally, a loan obtained from a bank will be a loan. (1 point)
Taxed
Term
Variable
Collateral-free
8. Which of the following is not a type of retail bank? (1 point)
Bond bank
Private bank
Offshore bank
Ethical bank
9. What type of banks were traditionally banks which enɡɑɡed in trade financing? (1 point)
Private
Merchant
Ethical
Offshore
10. Which of the following is an example of an unsecured bank loan? (1 point)
Credit card debt
Bank overdrafts
Corporate bonds
All of the above
2 Answers
-
I forgot
-
scythian is on the mark right here: the helpful integers are carefully built utilising Peano’s axioms, and a million+a million is the instant successor of a million, that’s defined as 2. yet i might thoroughly disagree with scythian’s argument that Godel’s Incompleteness Theorems are debatable; the only mathematicians that heavily experience this way are fringe logicians and maniacal set theorists. Godel’s theorems unfolded alot of recent venues in arithmetic, and a few ought to assert “freed” us from the very almost specific rigorous death to which we’ve been headed. in fact, Hilbert in 1900 asked “ought to somebody please set up a device of axioms that’s carefully consistent and serves as a foundation for all math?”, to which Godel replied, various years later, “no, no you may; any axiomatic device describing the integers might have specific unprovable statements, and a few that are consistent while taken care of the two as real and as fake.” To summarize: a million+a million is two through fact it extremely is defined that way, axiomatically, and for that reason can’t be shown decrease than the familiar device of Peano’s axioms. Steve EDIT – Above, as quickly as I say “unprovable statements”, I mean statements taken care of as real, yet no longer proved as such (no longer consisting of axioms). as quickly as I talk some fact being “consistent while taken care of the two as real and as fake”, I mean self reliant of the present axiomatic framework; it fairly is resembling asserting the framework won’t be able to prepare its very own consistency.
